Confused about edges on your CNC parts? Wrong choice means weak parts or higher costs. Learn when to pick fillets or chamfers for best results.
Choose fillets for rounded edges to reduce stress and improve strength. Opt for chamfers for straight, angled edges, often easier and cheaper to machine, especially for breaking sharp corners. Both are vital in CNC machining.
Making the right edge treatment choice is a common question I get from clients like Mark Chen from Canada. It seems like a small detail, but it can really affect your part's performance and, importantly, its manufacturing cost. As someone who deals with CNC machining parts daily at Worthy, I want to help you understand this better. Let's explore this more so you can design with confidence and get the best value from services like ours.

Are your part designs causing headaches? Choosing incorrectly between fillets and chamfers can lead to component failure or unnecessary expenses. Let's clarify when to use each for optimal performance.
Use fillets to distribute stress and prevent cracks, especially on internal corners subject to loads. Use chamfers for easier assembly, deburring, or when a sharp, clean break is functionally or aesthetically desired. Your specific application dictates the best choice.
The decision between a fillet and a chamfer often comes down to the part's function and manufacturing considerations. I've seen many designs come through Worthy for CNC milling and turning, and this is a key detail we often discuss with our clients to optimize their parts.
Stress Concentration: This is a major point. Fillets, with their smooth, curved surface, are much better at distributing stress. Imagine a bracket holding a heavy load. An internal corner with a generous fillet will be significantly stronger and more resistant to fatigue than one with a sharp corner or even a chamfer. This is absolutely critical for parts that will experience cyclic loading or high stress levels. Forgetting this can lead to premature failure, a pain point nobody wants.
Ease of Assembly: Chamfers are excellent for creating a small, angled flat surface that can guide pins, bolts, bearings, or other components during assembly. This lead-in feature can make a big difference in manufacturing efficiency, especially for high-volume CNC machining.
Deburring and Safety: Both fillets and chamfers can remove sharp, hazardous edges, making parts safer to handle and reducing the risk of injury or damage to other components. Chamfers are often a very quick and effective way to achieve this on external edges. At Worthy, we ensure sharp edges are broken and deburred by default, but specifying the type of edge break gives you more control.
Aesthetics: Sometimes, the choice is purely visual or aligns with a specific design language. Fillets tend to give a softer, more organic look. Chamfers often provide a more machined, technical, or industrial appearance.
Manufacturing Cost & Simplicity: This is a big one for clients like Mark, who are sensitive to pricing. Generally, an external chamfer is easier and therefore cheaper to machine than an external fillet. For internal corners, a fillet is often formed naturally by the radius of the cutting tool (like an end mill). Creating an internal chamfer, however, might require specialized tooling or more complex toolpaths. My general insight, from years of manufacturing, is that chamfers often have a wider processing range and can be simpler to operate for basic edge breaking.
Here's a quick comparison table I often share:
| Feature | Fillet (Rounded Edge) | Chamfer (Angled Edge) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Function | Stress reduction, improved strength, smooth transitions | Edge breaking, lead-in for assembly, guiding |
| Stress Handling | Excellent, especially for internal corners | Fair to Poor (though still better than a sharp corner) |
| Ease of Machining | Internal: often natural with round tools. External: may need form tool or ball end mill, potentially slower. | External: generally simple with angle cutter. Internal: can be complex or require special tools. |
| Relative Cost | Can be higher, especially for precise external fillets | Often lower, especially for simple external edge breaks |
| Typical Use | High-stress internal corners, aesthetic curves, fluid flow | Bolt holes, part edges for handling, guides for mating parts |
Understanding these points helps my clients get designs for their aluminum machining parts or steel components that are not only functional but also cost-effective to produce with our CNC machining services.
CAD commands for fillets and chamfers might seem similar at first glance, but they are not. Misunderstanding how these tools function can slow down your design process or lead to manufacturability issues. Let's see what each command really does for your parts.
Fillet commands in CAD create rounded edges or corners, primarily defined by a radius value. Chamfer commands create flat, beveled edges, typically defined by a distance, two distances, or a distance and an angle. Their geometric output and subsequent manufacturing implications differ significantly.

When you're designing parts in any modern CAD software, you'll find specific commands like "Fillet" (or "Round") and "Chamfer." While both are used to modify edges and corners, they work differently and produce distinct geometries. This directly impacts how we at Worthy approach the CNC machining of your parts, whether it's a simple turned component or a complex 5-axis milled part.
The fillet command is used to create a rounded internal or external edge.
Geometry Created: It generates a smooth, curved transition (concave for internal edges, convex for external edges) along the selected edge or between faces. This is a tangential arc.
Primary Parameters: The main input is the radius of the arc. Some advanced CAD systems also allow for variable radius fillets (where the radius changes along the edge) or even more complex conic shapes for very specific applications.
Impact on CNC Machining: For internal fillets, the resulting radius is often directly related to the cutting tool's radius. For instance, to machine a 2mm radius internal fillet, we would typically use a 4mm diameter end mill. If you specify a non-standard radius, it might require a special tool. External fillets often require a ball-nose end mill and profile machining, or a specific form tool, which can add to machining time and cost. We stock a wide range of standard tooling at Worthy to accommodate various fillet radii efficiently, always aiming for that standard as-machined surface finish of 125 Ra or better.
The chamfer command is used to create a beveled or angled flat surface along an edge.
Geometry Created: It creates a flat, sloped surface that truncates the original sharp edge.
Primary Parameters: You can usually define a chamfer in a few common ways in CAD:
Equal Distances (or Distance x Distance): Specifies equal distances measured back from the virtual sharp corner along both adjacent faces (e.g., a 2mm x 2mm chamfer results in a 45-degree angle).
Distance and Angle: Specifies a distance along one face and an angle relative to that face (e.g., 2mm at 30 degrees).
Two Distances (Unequal): Specifies different distances along each adjacent face, resulting in a non-45-degree chamfer.
Impact on CNC Machining: External chamfers are often quite straightforward to machine using standard angled cutting tools like chamfer mills or even spot drills for small chamfers on holes. This generally makes them cost-effective. Internal chamfers can be trickier and might require specialized tooling or more complex multi-axis machining, something we are well-equipped for with our 5-axis CNC machining capabilities. As I mentioned, my experience shows chamfering generally offers a wider processing scope and is simpler to operate for common edge breaks, especially external ones.
Understanding these CAD command differences helps you design parts that are not only functional but also optimized for efficient manufacturing. This can lead to reduced machining time and, ultimately, lower costs for your custom CNC parts.
Are sharp edges on your machined parts causing problems with handling or assembly? Chamfers offer simple, effective solutions. But when exactly should you make sure to specify them in your CNC designs?
Use chamfers to break sharp edges for improved safety and handling, to create essential lead-ins for mating parts like bolts or shafts, to reduce the risk of chipping on brittle materials, or for a specific desired aesthetic. They are often a cost-effective edge treatment.

Chamfers are incredibly useful and versatile features in CNC machined parts, and I see them specified in designs for many very good reasons. They are often a go-to solution for quick and effective edge treatment. Based on the thousands of precision machining projects we've completed at Worthy, for clients in North America, Europe, and beyond, here are some common scenarios where a chamfer is the preferred, or even necessary, choice.
Lead-ins for Assembly: This is perhaps one of the most common functional uses for chamfers. A chamfer on the edge of a hole or at the end of a shaft acts as a guide. It makes it much easier to insert bolts, screws, pins, dowels, or bearings. It also helps when mating two parts together, preventing jams or damage. This simple feature can save significant time and frustration during assembly processes, a direct benefit that someone like Mark Chen, focused on efficient operations, would appreciate.
Edge Breaking for Safety and Handling: Sharp edges on metal parts (like aluminum, steel, or titanium) or even on hard plastic components can be a significant hazard. They can easily cut hands during handling or assembly, or damage other components they come into contact with. A small chamfer, often specified as 0.5mm x 45° or 0.020" x 45°, effectively removes this sharpness. This makes parts much safer to handle and less likely to scratch or mar other surfaces. While we at Worthy break and deburr sharp edges by default as part of our quality process, explicitly specifying a chamfer dimension gives you precise control over the final edge condition.
Reducing Stress Concentration (in specific, lower-load cases): While fillets are undoubtedly superior for significant stress reduction, a chamfer is still much better than leaving a perfectly sharp internal or external corner, especially in brittle materials. For applications where stresses are not extreme, a chamfer can be sufficient to prevent cracking or chipping that might originate from a sharp edge.
Aesthetics and Appearance: Sometimes, a chamfered edge is simply part of the desired visual look of a product. It can give a clean, precise, and technical appearance, often associated with high-quality machining. This can be important for consumer products or any part where the visual aspect matters.
Cost-Effectiveness for Edge Treatment: Machining a simple external chamfer is usually faster and therefore less expensive than machining an external fillet. This is because it can often be done with standard angled cutting tools (like a chamfer mill) in a single, quick pass. For high-volume CNC machining, this cost difference can add up.
For instance, on many aluminum machining parts we produce for industrial applications, a quick chamfer on all exposed edges is standard practice for both safety and a clean, professional finish. We can easily accommodate any standard thread size and ensure these features are perfectly integrated.
Are your CNC machined parts failing unexpectedly near corners, or are manufacturing costs higher than anticipated? An incorrectly chosen fillet radius might be the culprit. Choosing it right is absolutely key for structural integrity and manufacturability. Let's learn how.
Choose an internal fillet radius that is large enough to reduce stress effectively but also practical for tool access. Consider using standard cutting tool radii to minimize cost. Material properties, available space, and adjacent wall thickness also guide selection.

Choosing the right fillet radius for your CNC machined parts is a critical design step. It's not just about making the part look smooth; it significantly impacts the part's strength, its durability under load, and even the cost and time it takes to manufacture. As an engineer here at Worthy, where we produce everything from prototypes to high-volume orders, helping customers optimize design details like fillet radii is a core part of our service. We want to ensure your custom CNC parts meet all specifications, including those demanding tight tolerances, sometimes even sub +/- 0.001" (+/- 0.0025mm), as per your GD&T callouts.
Here’s a breakdown of what my team and I always consider and advise our clients on:
| Factor | Consideration for Fillet Radius | Why it Matters for Your CNC Parts |
|---|---|---|
| Stress Concentration | A larger radius distributes stress more evenly and over a wider area. | Prevents stress risers, cracks, and fatigue failure; improves part lifespan under dynamic or static loads. |
| Standard Tooling | Design internal fillets with radii corresponding to standard end mill radii (e.g., 1mm, 2mm, 3mm, 5mm radius which come from 2mm, 4mm, 6mm, 10mm diameter tools respectively). | Reduces manufacturing cost and lead time by avoiding the need for custom or special cutting tools. We have many standard tools. |
| Material Properties | More brittle materials (like some tool steels or certain plastics) generally benefit from larger fillet radii. Ductile materials (like aluminum or mild steel) can often tolerate smaller ones. | Prevents material failure (cracking/chipping) during use or even during the machining process itself. We handle 100+ materials. |
| Space Constraints | The available physical space within the part's geometry may limit the maximum possible fillet radius. | You must balance the ideal engineering radius with the practical geometric limitations of the part design. |
| Minimum Feature Size | While our general minimum feature size is 0.020” (0.50 mm), for fillets, it's always better to go slightly larger if space permits. | Ensures good tool engagement, better surface finish (our standard is 125 Ra or better), and robust machining. |
| Adjacent Wall Thickness | Be careful that the fillet radius isn't so large relative to the part's features that it significantly thins out an adjacent wall or section. | Maintains the overall structural integrity and intended strength of the entire part, not just the corner. |
| Depth of Fillet | For deep internal corners, the length of the cutting tool becomes a factor. A very small radius in a deep pocket might be impossible to machine. | Impacts tool selection (length-to-diameter ratio) and machining strategy. May require 5-axis machining. |
For example, for general purpose aluminum parts, a 1mm, 2mm, or even 3mm fillet radius in internal corners is very common, practical, and easy for us to machine. For high-stress steel components or parts made from titanium for aerospace applications, we might recommend larger radii after a thorough design review.
We have four experienced engineers who are great at helping customers improve their designs and save costs. Getting the fillet radius right is a perfect example of how good design for manufacturability can prevent future problems and ensure you receive high-quality, reliable components. This proactive approach helps avoid pain points like receiving bad quality parts after a very long waiting time, ensuring your projects stay on track.
Choosing fillets or chamfers correctly impacts your part's strength, assembly, and overall cost. Fillets are best for reducing stress concentrations, while chamfers excel in aiding assembly and breaking sharp edges. Make these informed design choices for superior CNC machined parts.